Shadow Reduction in Ultrasound Imaging using Radiance Field Decomposition

RFlash: Radiance Field for Light-adaptive Shadow Reduction

Valentin Bacher, Pak Hei Yeung, Bernhard Kainz, Madeleine K Wyburd, Nicola K Dinsdale, Michael Gray, Ana IL Namburete

Correspondence: Valentin Bacher

Under Review ยท 2026

Abstract

Acoustic shadows can hide clinically relevant structures in ultrasound images, especially in fetal brain scans where the skull attenuates the signal before it reaches deeper anatomy. RFlash is a physics-informed post-processing method that reduces these shadows without requiring scanner hardware access. It decomposes an ultrasound image into attenuation and scatter maps, then uses a differentiable ultrasound simulator to render a shadow-reduced image.

Across fetal brain and abdominal ultrasound data, RFlash improves visual contrast consistency and reduces shadow-related intensity differences compared with the original images and a classical Hughes baseline. The same decomposition also produces shadow confidence masks that can support downstream shadow segmentation.

Overview

Ultrasound is portable, low risk, and widely used, but acoustic shadows can obscure anatomy behind highly attenuating structures such as bone. In fetal brain imaging this can make the proximal hemisphere harder to assess, limiting the visibility of bilateral structures that are clinically important.

RFlash treats shadow reduction as an image-formation problem. Instead of learning a direct image-to-image correction, it estimates physically meaningful maps that explain how ultrasound energy is attenuated and scattered through tissue. A shadow-reduced rendering can then be interpreted as virtually moving the probe through the tissue so that each depth depends less on structures closer to the transducer.

Methods

RFlash optimises explicit attenuation and scatter-intensity maps so that a differentiable ultrasound simulator can reproduce the input image. After this decomposition, the simulator renders a second image with the shadow-forming attenuation effect reduced. This keeps the method tied to ultrasound physics while remaining usable as post-processing on already beamformed images.

RFlash model
RFlash model

Results

Fetal brain: Original vs RFlash

RFlash shadow-reduced fetal brain ultrasound image RFlash
Original fetal brain ultrasound image Original

Fetal brain: Hughes vs RFlash

RFlash shadow-reduced fetal brain ultrasound image RFlash
Hughes shadow-reduced fetal brain ultrasound image Hughes

Abdominal ultrasound: Original vs RFlash

RFlash shadow-reduced abdominal ultrasound image RFlash
Original abdominal ultrasound image Original

Abdominal ultrasound: Hughes vs RFlash

RFlash shadow-reduced abdominal ultrasound image RFlash
Hughes shadow-reduced abdominal ultrasound image Hughes

Drag each slider to compare the original or Hughes-corrected image with RFlash.

Age Prediction

To test if the recovered structures from the proximal hemisphere are clinically useful, we trained a deep learning model to predict gestational age from the proximal hemisphere on normal ultrasound data and shadow reduced data. We tested on both hemisphere and found that shadow-reduction improves predictability, with the largest improvements of the predictability of the proximal hemisphere.

Age prediction results

Shadow Masks

The sliders below compare shadow mask from Meng et al. overlaid with the confidence masks derived from RFlash.

Shadow mask example 04

RFlash shadow mask overlay for example 04 Ours
Quinn shadow mask overlay for example 04 Quinn

Shadow mask example 07

RFlash shadow mask overlay for example 07 Ours
Quinn shadow mask overlay for example 07 Quinn

Shadow confidence overlays from Quinn compared with RFlash.

Cite

BibTeX

@misc{bacher2026shadow,
      title={Shadow Reduction in Ultrasound Imaging Using Differentiable Simulation and Radiance Field Decomposition}, 
      author={Valentin Bacher and Pak Hei Yeung and Bernhard Kainz and Madeleine K. Wyburd and Nicola K. Dinsdale and Michael Gray and Ana I. L. Namburete},
      year={2026},
      month={9},
      eprint={2609.29373},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CV},
      url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29373}, 
}